Welcome back — jump to Tutorials, Support & Docs, or What’s New. Go to PlatformNot you?Log out
Welcome back — jump to Tutorials, Support & Docs, or What’s New. Go to PlatformNot you?Log out
Welcome back — jump to Tutorials, Support & Docs, or What’s New. Go to PlatformNot you?Log out
Platform AI Agents Customers Developer Docs Services Company Careers Blog 2026 Benchmark Report Resources Comparisons Buyer's Guide Integrations Use Cases Tutorials Events Sign In Book a Demo
2026 B2B Benchmark · Finding 06 of 08

LinkedIn document ads made a lead for $142. Image ads $200, video $265.

Documents turned 11.9% of LinkedIn clicks into leads. Across all measured channels, image ads on lead-gen campaigns sourced 7.6x of pipeline per $1 and video 1.6x.

153 advertisers, $57.6M of 2025 spend, CRM pipeline for 90 of them

Cost per lead by LinkedIn ad format, 2025

What to do with it

Do

Test a document ad built from an existing gated asset alongside your current image ad.

Test

Use the same audience and offer. Compare cost per lead and lead quality, with enough budget and time to inform your decision.

Do not assume

That lead cost predicts pipeline. The broader pipeline figures do not establish a LinkedIn-specific causal advantage or show that video cannot generate pipeline.

The numbers

LinkedIn formatCost per lead
Document ad$142
Image ad$200
Video ad$265
Conversation ad$362

The full study covers 153 advertisers and $57.6M of 2025 spend, with CRM pipeline for 90 advertisers. This table shows LinkedIn CPL. The pipeline figures above cover all measured channels and reflect opportunity value credited to an ad-generated lead.

Filter these numbers by company size, industry and channel

See metadata.io in action

See how metadata.io builds audiences and manages campaigns.

Book a Demo